Its useful to talk about where solar energy will assist nature, there are many business caaes in a solar indexed stimulus scenario, which become apparent, when profit is no longer the object of business, and energy loss is no longer something we worry much about, because in the end, when the energy comes from the sun, anything we can put to use of it at all is reduction of temperature - the opposite of what happens when the energy is from the planet.
We won't mind powering greenhouses or biodome aircon or heating in places like deserts, or nothern places which can't normally grow tropical fruits, because whatever the greenhouse produces is still creation / reduction of entropy when the maximum energy that can be dissipated is returned to the atmosphere - it can never worse than if no energy from the sun was used at all, and look, more plants converts more sunlight that might have been heat, to things other than heat, its a win-win, there are no losses in this scenario, its all creation.
I call these scenarios positive multipliers. It can be difficult to see them, if we don't understand why sign energy.
It is all characterised by the energy polarity multiplier framework.
I think you've read some of my stories, hopefully you see that it is mostly new information, but fully verifiable, because its all done by formal systems Engineering techniques.
Mainstream science seems reluctant to accept it / confirm it, I believe this is because it is aniti profit, but they will have to come round, sooner or later.
Anyhow the Energy Polarity Multiplier Framework explains all the subtleties that come out when we mathematically sign energy.
