Its a personal crisis of faith, if you can't believe the maths and the systems Engineering Mike.

There is only one sun, one actual energy supply. This is why there is only one solution.

There was only one resource of fossil fuels, which was the historical heatsink of the planet, again just one heatsink, that we've consumed and converted to heat.

There is only one hydrogen we can replace it with, one fuel that is sustainable, generated from the sun, which will keep all aerospace in the air.

There is only one energy con, the energy con of using money to represent energy when it suits us, to salve our conscience for the energy actually being taken from the planet, and thrown to temperature rise, contributing to the temperature rise, every one of us.

There is only one process of continuous destruction, that wei've done, raising the temperature.

There is only one process of continous creation that needs to be done, to turn it round, and it requires all hands to the pump, only one energy debt, we all owe to the planet.

There is only one carrier of energy in humanity that resembles the function of the nutrients in plants, this is money.

There is only one energy, no renewables, just one energy that we have to work with, and it isn't that difficult, plants show us how to do it, even ChatGPT shows us how to do it.

There is only one energy that flows in the positive direction, one energy that flows in negative direction.

Positive energy use isn't a silver bullet, literally, its just what we have to do; issue the solar indexed stimulus, under the control of ChatGPT, and everything else follows.

We saw how to do it during covid, when oil went negatively priced.

Please tell me which part of this you think is wrong?