It would be cool to see any response from you, on what is the temperature cost of any and all effort on nuclear.
It has to have a temperature cost, because the net effect of nuclear is destruction, that is the conversion of matter to heat, and the temperature on the planet is continuously ramping up, we should conclude all activity done on energy which results from destruction has to multiply the initial temperature rise resulting from the initial destructive action.
Conversely taking energy which would be heat, if it was not used to create anything else, like nature does with the energy of the sun, has to have a negative temperature impulse, with higher order effects like the multipliers we see acting from our use of extracted energy, the multipliers in this case have to be of the opposite polarity, they act to further reduce temperature rise.
In other words we reap what we sow.
If we live by destruction then we have to die by it, actually as a species because it is physically unsustainable, the planet has only finite resources, we can't keep using them forever.
Whereas there is relatively infinite energy from the sun, it is ultimately sustainable for the practical future of humanity and all life, there is no cost of using it, but every price to pay for not using it.
Yet we don't monetise it, as yet we assign zero money issue to our use of it, whilst our use of that energy inevitably scales up, like it does in every plant that just formed leaves, money is devaluing in terms of energy, which is the only practical value of money, to transport energy from point of energy reception, to point of energy use. This is all whilst the planetary temperature is pushed up by our failure to move away from energy yielded from destruction, it's becoming pretty ludicrous, to carry on trying to convince ourselves that living by any kind of energy from destruction, is in any way good or sustainable.
It isn't, and it's time we realised it, as a species.
Its time we go photosynthetic now, by starting to issue solar indexed stimulus, reflecting the economic value of what has already been created from solar.
You should create a reward for some deserving soul in your organisation, whoever you might credit for ending the destructive run of nuclear.
But that would be the end of your organisation.
I guess you might not want that, but it is what has to happen, if we are to turn around what has been a destructive existence to date, to a creative existence.
This is the choice nature is putting to use, nature is the ultimate terrorist, the ultimatum is to start creating, or perish; do it or die. This is our choice as a species, no way around, we go with creation, or we perish.
There is no case for further nuclear now there is solar.