It would be a huge gap, if I'd ever made such a claim.

If you had read any of my stories you would know that I don't use the terminology of renewables at all, and you would know why.

So your accusation is unfounded, and actually casts doubt on your own claims, not mine.

You don't even know the claims I am making.

Please do tell us which company you work for, what products you've designed, who employs you to do the designing. Your employer, or your own business will surely not object to a little free promotion.

You don't write stories of your own, to give any of your words credibility, or promote your work whatever that is, or the work of whoever you claim to work for, and I don't recall you commenting on any of the stories of mine that you don't agree with, to say exactly which part or parts you think are wrong.

Right now, there is nothing to indicate that you are not just another flanneler, or even the same flanneler in different guise, the one that keeps coming round, trying your luck arguing with someone with real experience, real qualifications, real maths, real physics, who has spent an awful lot more time than you, working with applied physics.

If you understood it, then you would see it is inarguable, there is only one actual reality, one truth.

The fact you think its arguable, shows how little you really know about physics, and the system of nature.

It's you that looks the flanneler, until you show otherwise.