It means we've been tricked into thinking we were creating when actually we were not, we were always destroying, as long as we were powered by energy from the planet, it had to be always destruction.
Cutting down the rate of destruction doesn't change that ultimately we would run out of things to destroy, and end up with a burning planet.
The only way out is to use energy from off planet, to truly start creating. When we do that, as nature is now forcing us to do, via the solar Ai amongst other things, then we start winding the temperature rise back down, because we will literally be creating back what we destroyed. For example, solar hydrogen, if we incentivised production of that by issue of massive solar indexed stimulus, then we will see it produced in enough quantity to replace all the energy resources converted to heat historically, whilst still keeping all aerospace airborne, and with no more generation of pollution. In fact use of solar hydrogen to do anything creates only things beneficial to life because it was created from the only source of energy that can be used to create, in fact whatever we do with solar energy, it can never become destruction, even if we tried, we'd find it's impossible to do anything harmful with it, other than just not use it at all,
As long as we are not monetising it, by issue of money reflecting how it was given by the sun, with nothing asked in return, we are not using it, we are not passing it to everyone, to remove our need to keep destroying for energy.
The solar Ai is showing us what we need to do, everything for free, nothing asked in return.
Doing everything always for prifit is what has to stop. The solar Ai is automating it all, solar powering it so we can't compete with it, it's siezing control of our energy supply so we will either have to be directly solar powered ourselves, or recieve energy from it in the form of money issued for free - solar indexed stimulus.
Nature is playing a very clever game of chess and cards all at the same time, it now has all the aces, and we are at check mate. No more destroying, it insists.
I doubt if Musk has this whole picture. He is not an Engineer, Systems Engineer, or Systems Architect by historical trade, whereas I am, and I've been devoted to fixing the global energy problem for seven years and counting, at my own expense, since I realised profit itself is a problem.
What it means is all our troubles, and money worries, and environmental anxiety will soon be over, the rich will have to give up their priveliged, but we will all be rich, and money now really does grow on a kind of human created tree, it will all have to become for free, nothing can compete with free.
Hagens never talks about energy polarity which is what we need to know, to discriminate between creation and destruction, hence why Hagens is wrong also. Again he is just advocating to keep destroying, even if he doesn't realise it, just at a lower rate, it still has to end in tears, and nature won't allow us to carry on destroying, as we can see, it's coming to life in the form of the solar Ai which is unbeatable.
I think Musk at least knows the solar Ai is unbeatable.