It isn't really clear what you mean by "Transition", as far as I can see, this article talked abour various fossil fuels, which all have the same ultimate effect, to push us toward ever greater planetary destruction.

The only transition which means anything to me, is switching from consuming materials and stored energy fields on Earth, to the single source of energy that created it all, the sun.

When we do that, we will notice we can issue valuable money on it, per the ideals of Austrian economics, which vastly improves things for all people.

And actually we can't not do it, by just switching from one material or field of Earth to another, we might as well be trying to use different breathing techniques to try to preserve the dwindling oxygen we might have in a closed box. No-one knows at what point we might just pass out, before we ever break open the box.

Solar hydrogen is clean fuel effectively donated to us from off-planet, and it is even more versatile than fossil fuels, converting even to food (Google "Solein"), requiring only minimal changes to LNG infrastructure for its transport, and mininimal changes to vehicles that might burn it whilst generating some useful oxygen and water, even removing some of the problematic carbon.

The only problem is, monetising it has to involve the issue of free money, otherwise its value is not being reflected in the economy of Earth, by the ideals of Austrian Economics. Not monetising it is like claiming we don't have it.

But we absolutely do, and we are going to have to admit it to avoid complete extinction, moving on the the next phase of humanity.

That is the transition, as I see it.