Frederick Bott
3 min readMay 19, 2024

--

It does wind me up that mainstream science still paints the climate problem as just something relative, despite a full analysis done using fully scientific methods (MBSE), to show that what we are seeing is the beginning of what will become an abrupt, physical end to all life, and every one of us, everyone who ever existed, contributed to it, without mostly even realising it, virtue signalling to the bitter end, if we can't mobilise radical change.

It isn't just a climate problem, its an energy problem.

We are acting more or less like swarming ants, under the control of an ancient emergent property, a learned behaviour, trained by an unknown entity in history, to destroy the planet, for the benefit of the unknown entity who is no longer physically there, maybe never was, but programed us for sure.

In its absence, we act like automatons, generation after generation, in a system of energy slavery, constantly covering up the truth, constantly lying, creating a world around us in the parts of the world benefiting a minority at the expense of the greater majority that is not real. its lies, all lies, we live on lies, lies are destruction, its official, even lab tested, every bit of information created should lower temperature by 0.69 x Boltzman's constant in degrees C or K, but look, our net effect is the opposite, we are not creating information at all, we are destroying it, we are destroying all creation, because all creation is information, and we lie about this, covering it up by a story that the temperature rise is due to greenhouse effects, when the atmosphere is adiabatic, therefore not capable of supporting any blanket effect - what we are measuring is direct increase of entropy, but we'd rather not call it out, because we depend on the constant lying, constant destruction, for the energy we at least need to each individually metabolise, before anything else.

The learned behavior is imprinted into us, by trauma in our history.

John Trudell had it almost all correct. The only thing he got wrong, probably because he was not deeply technical, was the infusion of energy he talked about us needing, has to come from the sun, rather than from within us as he believed, which is technically impossible, there always has to be an external energy source powering us, it can be either Earth, or the sun, now we have the technology for it to be the latter. But he was well on the way to seeing the whole problem, without the aid of modern Systems Engineering tools and methods, somehow he got most of the picture right mostly from indigenous knowledge, which again we are busy destroying, deleting.

If you don't have a clue what I am talking about, this is evidence of the system, which works to suppress this information, it is trying to cancel me as I speak, even rewriting what I write, to change the meaning where it can, and never ever promoting it to anyone who matters, and definitely I can't be funded, because this information questions the culrprit imprinting lie, the energy lie of profit at the heart of it all. Trace how profit works, what it actually is (Energy gained exclusively from the planet as a product of work), and it leads to all the harm, all the lies, all the tempeerature rise, all the climate change, all the wars, all the genocide, and all of it, is unnecessary now, we have the technology to stop it tomorrow, but we don't because we are way too busy lying about it, to really think about it.

You could read this and think its all crazy sounding nonsense, or you might think there is enough in it to seek a closer look, in which case I'd recommend searching out John Trudell's 2010 "Think I'm crazy" video on Youtube, watch it, then buy the book below, because by buying this book, you will be doing something more than virtue signaling, you will be furthering the cause of truth, as well as gaining some satisfaction by absorbing the main concept which comes out of the MBSE examination of the system:

https://www.amazon.com/Interview-Ai-Part-Multiplier-Framework-ebook/dp/B0CHGFKQVB

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

No responses yet