Member-only story
Is Medium actually working to protect the Grand Energy Ponzi?
Something Weird
So you wrote a new story, the first in a while, your latest analysis of the Grand Energy Ponzi (GEP), maybe.
Of course we can fix it.
But only if folks know about it.
In the lead up to publishing the story, you were responding to the GEP relevant stories of others, receiving regular acknowledgements and engaging in dialog, seeing your followers list very slowly but steadily grow, with a couple of new followers per day.
Publish the story and… nothing.
So you publish another, with the same information from a different perspective.
Still nothing.
Not even from all the dialog you were engaged in, save for a spam response from some unknown spammer who appears to have spoofed the profile of one of someone you were previously in dialog with.
Even though you published it on a Friday, when activity is normally highest.
A whole weekend with a sudden cessation of all interactions after publishing two stories, one even about the upcoming COP26 summit, is a bit weird, surely.
One might even come to the conclusion that medium could be actively suppressing information about the GEP.
Well, actually it is.
Even though fixing the GEP is the only way to avoid us burning on our planet, literally.
What does it mean, if a platform actively suppresses information necessary to avoid the destruction of our planet, and us, humanity?
It means the platform is working towards ending humanity.
I do what I can.
But if the platform stops it, there is nothing I can do about that, except write stories like this, to try to call it out.