Interesting, good to know the latest thinking of the conventional researchers, thanks for posting.
But in my opinion none of it makes much difference.
What we are seeing here appears to be an effort to justify how competition between natiions will somehow solve the problem.
It won’t.
Competition between nations is the problem.
Capitalism; the capitalisation of all energy and work, past, present, and future, is the problem.
As long as that is the business model of even science itself, nothing will change.
The real relationship between asset values, and climate change, is the other way round, from what has been proposed in your article.
The article proposes nation held asset values will drive rectification of climate change.
Actually it is those asset values which perpetuate climate change.
Assets are kinds of capital.
As long as those exist in the hands of some competing party or another, we can’t stop climate change, only maybe slow it by some very small amount.
But it doesn’t just need to be slowed, or even stopped, it actually needs to be reversed.
That requires whole a new world of uncensored, fully collaborative truth.
No more competiition.
No more nationalistic, colonial capitalism.
That seems to be clear to the non ruling, non-elite classes of people around the world.
They are united, but the governments are not.
We appear to be being led by imbeciles, but things are changing now, led by economy, which is largely out of control of competing governments.
The people around the world, the vast majority, decide what are assets, and what are not, despite every attempt by governments to restrict our choice.
The people are putting the highest value on the things they see as theirs, not owned by governments.
The mechanisms at work are still best described as the "Bitcoin Kardashev Hinge", I think.