Indeed, your final comment says enough, and that is where we are headed, by devaluation of all money, until it is issued to reflect the economic product of solar already put to use.
As explained in my own response to the author, we could short circuit the process of uniting everyone by poverty, by issuing the stimulus representing the backlog of unmonetised solar already put to use, uniting everyone by donated prosperity, instead, instantly.

By waiting, we also take the risk that money will have devalued beyond the capability of implementing the required solar infrastructure to complete the task of going 100% solar, as we saw experienced in Sri Lanka, where there is no shortage of sun, but a distinct shortage of valuable money to implement their transition.

Add to this, ongoing developing war, and ongoing developing environmental disaster, with the escalating death counts and misery associated with those. How much worse those things will get, whilst we fight over the remaining spoils of extracted energy, is anyone’s guess.
This, is what we will continue to see whilst waiting for everyone to become united by poverty.
Which do you choose?