Indeed, they are interesting concepts, thanks for flagging those up, they do go some way to formalising deeper analysis, I would urge some caution in using them though because they are terminology beyond what most folk understand about energy, its like accountants blinding folk with jargon. There was also a known tendency for specialists in this area of physics in recent years to fall into the trap of forgetting that Earth is not a closed system, concentrating on the detailed descriptions of thermodynamic economic value effects on Earh as it if was closed, concluding creation is not possible.

Ethan Seigel highlighted that this had been spotted in mainstream science and that it had issued a correction to ensure the misconception wasn't propagated too much more into curriculums than it already was.

The system was more or less closed from an economic point of view, before we had solar, closed system analysis did more or less apply, but now we have significant solar, currently uncredited by utilities energy companies, because most of it is domestic and community based, outside their control, the system is now well and truly open, and this is what opens up the realisation of how to create, reversing increase of entropy, it can only be done using the energy of the sun, and we have to acknowledge only life does it, in fact this looks like the primary purpose and challenge of life, to reverse increase of entropy.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/emergy

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/exergy