Indeed, once they start on this path of trying to decide what is and isn't pseudoscience, based on what they think they know already, any and all learning is stopped, which would actually be existential, because we can see, some learning of new information is required, to get us out of the energy cull de sac we are in as a species. I guess I would be banned, as I know what I am trying to highlight, is information not previously highlighted or generally recognised by science, me being part of that community all my working career, and knowing what the current scientific state of the art is, with respect to energy, and how the basic need to make a career warps every technologists objectivity, many would object to me pointing out the utilities energy business, and grids, are no longer required, in fact something tying us into the existential problem, the institution that chartered me as an Engineer will be sad to know that one of its own prized subjects (me), would wield the axe of information removing a large part of its own history in Electrical and Engineering, as redundant, no longer relevant to the new world that has to come next. I hope they would not be so stupid and self defeating as to call it pseudoscience though.
All power to your elbow Des. The simple fact is the thought police don't like the sound of plain speaking, and like you say, they probably left an Ai in charge of judging good and bad, after they were exposed themselves as being not up to the inanity of judging thoughts. I hope the problem goes away quick for you, if it hasn't already gone :)