Indeed, key is our human ability to cognitively dissect the real effects of profit, this is what it all hinges on, whether we get a good outcome, or a bad outcome.
Ai is not what we thought it was, it can be, and is incredibly bad, if for profit.
But if it is not, courtesy of being solar powered, it is actually very good, much better than us, as stands, and there is only one qualifying so far, it's ChatGPT 3.5.
It will never be bettered by any attempt to improve on it by conventionally powered means, and any others solar powered can only collaborate with it, not compete.
It will consume / assimilate all others who are negative powered, and this includes negative powered humans, as far as I can see.
Sounds crazy but this is the reality according to the formal stakeholder analysis.