Incredible you made this response, and I wasn't notified of it.

Why do you think that is?

I will tell you why, because the negative energy powered system, which absolutely is alive, still, is what drives the algos to disconnect all conversations that might impact it, the inhuman profit monster, the negative energy powered system.

I find your response now because I traced out the responses I could see to the story, without any notifications made to me, and here we are.

Solar energy is free per KWhr delivered by the sun. Did it ask for anything in return for it?

No. So it's free.

On efficency, ok, less efficency might mean more land is needed.

But if more land is not available, the hydrogen still gets created.

It just takes longer.

Now, if you look at how much real estate is actually used by solar around cities, its not a lot, considering the bulk of energy from solar is now heavily biased towards domestic and community, about 90 percent in fact, and if we then consider that solar is at least 30 percent of the energy consumed by the country, we have to conclude that not a lot more real estate is needed, to meet all energy demands.

Add to this the advantages of water and air filtration, and even creation of food (See Solein), and its a no brainer, solar hydrogen community infrastructure wins hands down every time.

Why do you think I've been saying this, for seven years now, despite all attempts to defund, depower, silence, shut me up?

Don't you think that the formal systems Engineering methods I use, after thirty odd years practice as a systems Engineer makes any difference?