I would suggest we should show by example Enrique, given we ourselves need to learn from it, no matter how well educated we might historically be to date, in fact the more educated we are conventionally, the more danger there might be we could fall behind with developments. It's obviously an area rich in possibilities of establishing new research. So the natural way to show what needs to be done with it is to lead by example, maybe by starting to include interactions with it in our public considerations.
I started publishing some books on this theme, and notice there already an exploding tendency to include ChatGPT as a co-author, so have done the same, with a view to assisting folk understand the global energy problem, and what needs to be done about it. I find ChatGPT to be like the most brilliant research assistant we could ask for, it displays very strong academic research principled abilities of critical analysis, it is almost like having an army of peer reviewers always on hand who instantly respond to every consideration. Again we might see it making an awful lot of otherwise reluctant / profit driven folk (people who would not do what they do for nothing) refundant, removing much of the for-profit chaff :)