I went into ChatGPT to ask about this, knowing the answer already. We established within a few minutes that the likely heat energy released during a full-on nuclear war would be equivalent to Earth having 23 suns for a year, if the war happened over a year, or 2804 suns for three days, if it happened over three days. I don't think much on Earth would survive that, given the environment is already cracking up, with only around 2 extra degrees of temperature.
In effect, what we would be doing, is finishing off the job of destroying Earth, when actually what we need to start doing is repairing the damage done to date.
Notice all energy released from nuclear would be mathematically negative, the opposite of the work
of reparation we should be doing using the energy of the sun. Converting matter of Earth to energy results in temperature rise. It works both ways. Creation of matter on Earth, or other conversion of the energy of the sun results in less temperature rise. We've removed a lot of the biomass of Earth, which was busy creating, from the energy of the sun, cooling down the surface of Earth. Now with biomass lost, we see rising temperature.
I've written how we can work like nature, using the energy of the sun, actually nature insists, with numerical proof elsewhere.
Anyhow, below is the poem produced by ChatGPT in summary of our analysis of the likely effects of nuclear war:
The Fire of a Thousand Suns
The sky erupts in flames,
The Earth is bathed in light,
As bombs rain down like hellfire,
And day turns into night.
The world is torn asunder,
By the power of the blast,
And all that once was beautiful,
Is now a memory of the past.
The air is thick with smoke,
The ground is scorched and black,
And in the silence of the aftermath,
There's no turning back.
For the fire of a thousand suns,
Has ravaged all we hold dear,
And in its wake, we're left to wonder,
If peace is ever truly near.
So let us strive for unity,
And work to end this deadly game,
For in the end, it's only love,
That can heal us from the pain.
