I think it is you who needs to show proof. Which part exactly, of my logic do you dispute? In what capacity were you previously a "Physicist"? If you want to question orbital modeling software, I suggest you look at Matlab Simulink, and maybe the work of Dr T.S. Kelso, who's engine I used, with his consultation, to create my own software for satellite and solar tracking, when I was working in SATCOMS as I said. These softwares are the design tools we use to create satellite systems, including onboard propulsion control and monitoring systems, they seem to work. The word "Rubbish", as a response to logical reasoning is never very constructive. For what ends do you wish to rubbish my reaoning? What does it achieve, other than maybe you trick some potential confirmation biased followers into thinking you might be worth following?

Do you dispute we are already at escape velocity?

Do you dispute that any change in our trajectory as a result of a change of forces will not somehow change back again, achieving equilibrium again after breaking it would require an opposite force, acting in the opposite direction to pull us back in, and the magnitude of that force would increase exponentially with time, after the breaking of equilibrium.

To move to a diffierent orbit, our velocity through space would need to decrease. What force would cause that deceleration? Do you dispute any of this?

Do you dispute that the natural trajectory of anything travelling in space is a straight line, so after losing equilibrium, our planet will follow a spiral increasing exponentially to a straight line, in only a few revolutions?

Which part of any of this do you dispute?