I love that you are busting the myth of livestock being responsible for greenhouse gases. It's alarming Denmark has already implemented any kind of carbon taxes.
Thr whole business of carbon taxing is just more energy scarcity enforcement which doesn't help anyone, it just entrenches and locks us into more business for profit, which is itself monetised destruction, which looks much more likely to be the real reason for temperature rise, not greenhouse gases.
Its profit that the system analysis shows is to blame.
If we research the greenhouse gases theory, it comes from scientists in another Skandinavian country, Sweden. I've seen several explanations of the theory, not all the same, which makes an alarm bell ring to me. Researchers are not agreed on the actual mechanism. On one hand the theory claims sunlight reflected from the planet as heat is trapped in the atmosphere, the latter acting as a kind of blanket, this insulating the Earth such that we see rising temperature.
That theory I'd say can't be true because firstly the atmosphere is adiabatic. Adiabatic means it is free to expand around the planet, the molecules of the atmosphere are not constrained by any kind of container. The atmosphere follows the adiabatic law of pressure vs density vs temperature. This is well known, confirmed in many ways and very thoroughly documented and analysed.
In fact, because it's adiabatic, the atmosphere acts as a refrigerant, its the opposite of a blanket. The planet would be much hotter without it, than it is with it!
The other argument of greenhouse gases claims some sunlight is reflected back from the atmosphere to Earth, this increasing the radiation from the sun absorbed by Earth.
This argument doesn't stack up with historical measurements of the power density of the sun on the planet.
We know the latter is about 1KW per sq meter in ideal conditions for solar panel use. That has not changed much in the time we've been measuring it, and neither has the Albedo of Earth changed significantly due to atmosphere. There has been noticeable change of Albedo due to decreasing ice coverage, but no significant change due to the atmosphere itself. And look, a more reflective atmosphere would result in less sun getting to Earth in the first place, the effect on the planet would again be cooling, not heating, by a more reflective atmosphere, and only then if there was not plant mass, which again has to consume heat, and we don't know what effect a more reflective atmosphere affecting energy power density on the planet would have on those, probably not good, if it was affected at all by Geoengineering. Reducing plant mass is a much more obvious explanation for why we see rising temperature, there is simply less plants absorbing the heat enetgy of the sun, converting it to all the things that we and the rest of life depend on to get our own metabolistic energy, which all comes from the sun.
This is the simple vital information being distracted from, by all the hype and activity being done, always at profit by yet more business of carbon management, and actually "renewables" except solar. Hence why I wish mainstream science would call itself out and admit it has a huge conflict of interest by being profit driven.
They can't deny this, we are all dependent on extracted energy as long as we practice profit, and this warps the objectivity of every analysis, if it isn't acknowledged and questioned at every turn.
The very simple conclusion of where we are really at, is that we’ve exhausted what we can use of the energy of the planet. Now we have to move to the energy of the sun, and when we do so, we will automatically repair a lot of the damage done, but we have only a short window of opportunity to do this.
If we fail to do it, then we will perish, and it won't be pleasant, the genocides we are seeing done by both humans and environment can only get worse.
Also the "Richest" don't realise how poor they are, on a planet impoverished by profit.
I show how to reverse all of this, but we are still in the spell of profiting from carbon management, which fixes nothing, just accelerates the temperature rise, because the temperature rise is direct measure of increase of entropy (destruction), and profit is monetised destruction.
Calculate all the energy in profit by converting the money to energy at market rates of KWhrs, and look to see the direction of flow of energy, it's always from Earth outwards, in the opposite direction than the energy of the sun to Earth, from the folk in the places with depleting energy resources even through utilities energy companies, from all users to every platform, from all users to every government and every establishment, we truly are like ants, operating exactly like swarming ants, in a kind of energy slavery mode, we are a scourge on the planet, an energy scourge, as stands, as long as we keep practicing profit.
The only way out is to monetise the energy of the sun - solar indexed stimulus.
This will be us finally moving to the energy of the sun, away from the energy of the planet, allowing the latter to recover, but not only recover, we'd be helping it, like the biggest plant that ever existed, our benefit to the planet in photosynthetic mode is more than we can calculate, and even the poorest human in that world is richer than the richest in the current world that we've almost energy starved to death.