I like your article because it is asking the right questions. But there seems to me to be one or two questionable assumptions, like the one above. I would love to know why you believe this. To me the very act of expecting profit in a zero sum world, (As implied by what is presented as a fixed money base) is surely unfair. If one or the other profits in an exchange then of course one is disadvantaged whilst the other is advantaged.

Do you have any examples that show otherwise?

My articles (260+ to date), focus on creating wealth from the energy of sunlight, which requires that we issue money in response to Joules received, but as yet we don't formally do that. If we did, then I would agree there can be profit with no loss, therefore making debt (and capital) redundant. But officially, we don't yet, as far as I know.