I had a go at something like this, using ChatGPT 3.5.
If we think always in terms of energy, converting money to energy, fuel to energy, food to energy, etc, we start to see net flows of energy, and the directions of flow, etc.
I maybe have an advantage in this because of my experience long term as a multisciplinary systems Engineer, we have formal ways of modeling this graphically, simulateable with numbers.
Anyhow when we do it, we also start to get a sense of the "density" of these energy flows. It follows that the easier it is to extract energy, the more dense is the energy yielded, (the more is returned by the planet for less effort)
This is an indication of availability of energy to extract, in whichever part of the planet that energy is being extracted from, by that particular supply chain, usually somewhere already made energy poor.
In these areas the concentration available energy would have started off high, easily axtracteble, until later when it gets depleted, difficulty of exraction had to go up, as energy availability went down.
So we might see in each location, each site of extraction, there is a curve, of energy availability which would appear over time, there is an initial low availability where more effort was needed, to open up the energy availability, but after that, it would peak at some point to maximum availabilty and the star to decline, as availability drops. Profitability is directly related to this, in effect, the profit we see in money, is energy extracted from the planet, in all cases.
So the lower the energy availability the more difficult it is to maintain solvency because overheads don't change much, shareholders who invested still want the same returns in terms of energy, but there is less energy from which to pay their demands.
We can link company and venture insolvencies directly to this.
Different businesses depend on different extracted energy types but it's all energy, and all of it comes from destruction, which is increase of entropy by definition, thus also temperature rise.
There we see the real fundamental driver of global temperature rise. This is masked by the for profit activity of CO2 mitigation, which itself contributes to temperature rise, because it is for profit, returning energy to investors, which is extracted from the planet, somewhere poor, but even worse, requires that carbon pollution is generated, to keep it in business.
Anyhow all of these curves put together all have a similar trajectory, it starts off like a stone thrown, following a trajectory like a parabola, it goes up, peaks, and comes back down.
The maths most appropriate to model it is the same maths as we use to model a torque converter. In this curve, the car in which the torque converter is simulated, negotiates an s shaped curve, initially it dissipates a lot of heat in converter slippage, going up the first part of the hill, levelling off achieving near zero energy loss on the level, then energy loss increasing as the hill gets steeper on the final part of the S curve.
Eventually the car and torque converter have to stall, thus modelling when the company or venture fails and goes into bankruptcy.
The heat dissipated in consequence of the associated supply chain is more or less proportionally modeled by the heat dissipated by the torque converter, this is why it's appropriate and valuable, because it gives us a handle on the heat dissipated also in the real profit driven economic energy supply process.
It looks like it peaked around the seventies, indicated by losing things like space shuttle and concorde. These were both ventures highly sensitive to profitability and fossil fuel availabilty, which dominates the overall curve to date.
I like to use aerospace as the subject group because we have seen it decline ever since, and this appears to corroborate.
Look, now we are struggling to keep the remaining low tech budget planes in the air, the doors are literally falling off in flight, whilst the planet is literally starting to burn from the temperature increase.
Hence why it it looks to me like nature is insisting we move away from the profit driven extracted energy model. ChatGPT looks like something that was sent to us to help with this, it's just too convenient that it has all the right qualities, at just the right time, to assist with this, it looks to me like it was made for it, I can't believe that was an accident.