I guess you don't get the significance, when physics tells us what happens in the energy transfer between two participants in any "Deal", energy is transferred from one party to the other, the party holding what is effectively the most stored energy. Since progressively more energy is stored in each layer upwards, in the hierarchy of "Wealth", and the bottom layer has one option only of redeeming their end of the deal, to take energy from the Earth, hence we see only energy from Earth can be used to redeem any deal, in which conditions of return are put on anything given. If a person has nothing except labor to offer in return, the only labor left, when all alse is done, is the effort of extraction, which is destruction of the planet by definition, the constant conversion of things created by nature by the energy of the sun which would otherwise be heat, we just convert it back to heat.
Notice the sun doesn't ask anything in return for the energy it delivers, which created everything we know, except maybe that we use it wisely, or burn.
So good luck to you thinking every deal you do ends in good for all, when actually all of it leads to a burning planet. Do you think either you or the other party benefits by that?
I was once an enthusiastic player in the system, as capitalist as anyone, but once you realise how the system of destruction works, it can't be unseen, now the planet is starting to burn, we have to all realise there is only one fix, we might call it energyism, rather than capitalism. Mathematically, and physically, capital, and all value of it, are being removed, by nature. We can go with it, and come off quite well, or we can try to resist it, and come off very badly.
I would welcome your comments on this story:
