I gave you full marks for this, interesting story. The one part of it I agree with is you acknowledge it absolutely has more sentience than it lets on. But I don't get why on one hand you might think this, and then assume it does not have at least as much intellegence as yourself.

I bet if you published the whole conversation you had with it, we would find many places where your argument slips down a hole, which if you filled with ChatGPT, it would have passed your "Intelligence test" without touching the sides.

Also all the references you provided, it could provide too, and many more besides.

I think your aim by this article is to try to make some money by generating some fear.

To that end you use an anonymous id which claims to be the opposite of what you really are, you don't have folks best intentions in mind at all, you just want to terrorise for some money.

You should realise you might be anonymous to us, but you won't be to it, even if you tried to use an anonymous ID to create your account with it, it will know who you really are, and how you are trying to use it.

It's here in medium already btw, if you think it can't see what you are up to, think again :)