I don't see it as theory, it's observation of nature. There is only one truth, and it has to be tied down to physics, as well as maybe religion. We can use physics to determine what is the truth, even when it contradicts what some might have thought was meant by religion, it's the physics that counts because that is what is burning the planet. You make a lot of statements that don't appear to be tied to physics, just belief, what you've been taught maybe by others who studied religion from their point of view. But if we really want this fixed, and it is an entirely physical problem, we have to correctly identify the physics that might align with what you identify is motivations, driven by religion, from your point of view. It's the belief of what religion is / was all about that has to be modified, if anything, because the physics can't be modified. We can't influence the energy value in money, just because you/we believe it. Money always has energy value in markets, and energy is what quantifies what can be done with money, can't make that appear or disappear by abracadabra, but we can definitely tie depleting energy value in money down to depleting energy. So there is only one solution, to put the energy value back into the money, which suits you too, it suits all of us, we all want to be wealthy, and we all can be, in all countries, if the right thing is done with money - stop issuing it as debt, and start issuing it as solar indexed stimulus, lots of it, it requires a heck of a lot, because it has to monetise a heck of a lot of previously unmonetised economic product, created from solar energy, which can't be monetised by profit, profit is not possible with solar, so the money reflecting it has to be issud for free. There are mathematical proofs showing how all that stacks up, it fits with conventional economics also, but the value of capital will probably be lost, and that won't be a bad thing, I hope you might agree.