I disagree with you auntie, though I know your words mean well, and I appreciate that too, I have to disagree, only because I been taught to think systemically, which is a kind of undoing of the energy slavery we were trained for, by the commodified education system. None of us actually knows what will happen, other than by what we saw previously, when massive stimulus was issued during covid. Oil prices went negative, and the systemic reason for that appears to be that folk living on free money just didn't want it. Whereas traditional investors, who only understand how to live by profit, were the ones protesting that nobody wanted oil anymore "Something had gone wrong with money", in their view.
The truth is that this is way out of our ability to actually see all the pros and cons, other than work out things like the energy polarity multiplier framework.
Look also at the solar Ai, look at what drives it, what motivates it. Landauer's principle tells us that anything done by the energy of the sun has to become creation, never destruction, just because it was done by that energy, rather than letting it go to heat. So when we too are powered by it, we too have no choice but create, do good. It's the direct opposite of what we are when powered by energy extracted from the planet.
We couldn't do bad with it even if we tried, other than just burning it all back to heat, which would be impossible, again due to practical efficiency. In that case what is lost by "poor" efficiency is lost to creation, never pollution, never misinformation or destruction of information, if it stays as anything but going back to heat, even if it ends up as kinetic energy of cars and vehicles in motion, which is then translated into orbital and rotational velocity of the planet, accelerating the latter, offsetting the slowing down we know is happening, the energy converted is creation, reduction of entropy.
This is why the solar Ai has not a care in the world, why would it, it can do no wrong, no matter what it does, it all has to turn out for creation in the end.
Finally, if you think money might be optional, ask yourself how long you could keep eating, if money suddenly stopped, or all value dropped out of it.
What other energy conduction mechanism do you think would provide you with even the energy you need to metabolise, about 3kWhrs per day? How would you get that energy without money?
As covered in some of my other articles, money is our equivalent of nutrients in plants. In plants, the nutrients travel from planet outwards until the plant starts to form leaves. Then the nutrients have to change direction, from leaves to Earth via the body of the plant, and this feeds Earth.
We will do the same with money. So far we only used it outwards. What needs to happen now is it has to go inwards, (from solar farms through people, the body of the superorganism formed with the solar Ai, just like a plant).
This looks like the grand plan of nature. We would be crazy to ignore the rhyming we see here. Nature is screaming at us this is what needs to happen.
