I didn't see your latest questions until now, apologies.

To accept the energy of the sun, we have to do like plants do, convert it to do the same in humanity as the nutrients in plants do.

Money is the mechanism we have used to build our species up, extracting the energy from Earth in the same way as plants do until they form leaves, they haul all their energy up from Earth until then.

We have the same kind of energy deficit owed to Earth as a plant does, before it forms leaves, only ours is much bigger.

Now we have formed the leaves in the shape of solar farms, it seems logical to just reverse the action of money, from something that draws energy from Earth, to something that puts it back, thus also reversing many of the effects of pollution.

The reason I say these things as assertions, is I have spent a number of years analysing the energy system of the sun and Earth using formal systems training, tools and techniques gained over thirty years as a practicing engineer, I started doing this during a candidate PhD project in 2017, where I also was trained with some academic research skills.

Analysing the system from every aspect I've found, all of it consistently points to the sun being the only source of energy.

So all energy we take from stores on Earth are from finite stores, and will have cumulative damaging effects, given enough time.

Running up a deficit of solar energy we can replace by using the sun is one thing, but what about using energy from the core of Earth, that we can't put back?

That would be the question I would ask.

Did you know that the biomass of Earth creates a motor effect on our planet?

This follows since plants in the mornings have to absorb more solar energy than in the evenings, when they are not so "hungry".

So there is greater solar pressure on the side of Earth receding from the sun than the side approaching.

That would have an effect of keeping us turning.

Even more surprising, solar panel coverage has exactly the same effect, panels connected with backup systems like batteries and hydrogen generation, are hungrier for energy in the mornings than the evenings, so they too will contribute to the motor effect.

Now note that our need to insert leap seconds into atomic clocks every year or two, indicates our planet is slowing down, and that this slowing down has increased steadily since we started measuring it in the seventies. A year is now about 30 seconds longer than it was back then.

We should be concerned that this coincides with loss of biomass, amongst other things, I would say.

What other signs do we need from nature, telling us what to do? :)