Frederick Bott
1 min readNov 1, 2024

--

I am surprised you were picked on, but to be honest I wouldn't worry about anything an anonymous profile says, firstly their anonymity makes them fundamentally dishonest, when push comes to shove in arguments they can say whatever they like, any accusation will do, they have no skin in the game, and no responsiblity to face any music themselves.

Secondly all new science is pseudo science to start with, my own materials would probably be similarly classified, just because its new, using techniques still unfamiliar to most scientists.

I don't agree with your conclusions, but I wouldn't go as far as calling it pseudo science, it looks like a genuine scientific attempt for clarity, knowing that conventional science obviously has it wrong.

Anyhow, I don't think the platform would seriously dare throwing out information that could turn out to be existentially important physical truth, based on the say of an anonymous profile. The ghost making the accusation is probably overstepping or overstating their authority, they probably have no authority.

I would question their authority, rather than worry about them, treat them as you would any other troll, just bar them from your stories, then they won't be offended by your materials any longer. In a way, we are doing them a favor, without doing them a favor, if we just bar them from our information, which they don't actually know is valuable or not, its their loss if we remove it from them.

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

Responses (1)