I am sorry we've come head to head on this Ricky.
You claim with certainty Ai has an "Energy cost" without knowing much about it.
When I quoted Landauer's principle to you, in the story you asked for, from me, explaining to you why the solar Ai does not have "energy cost", linking also to the research I've done, also published in Medium, explaining the Bitcoin Kardashev Hinge from an energy point of view, and showing how money-fuel tree energy architecture encountered in proof of work mining works, in terms of energy, you responded that my use of Landauer's principle "Does not stand up to scrutiny".
But you have not said why, in your comments to that story, or anywhere else I know about.
What part of putting the energy of the sun to use as things other than heat, thus reducing entropy and temperature, does not make sense to you?
It would help me understand why you can't accept and therefore remember that information, if you at least explained your logic, flawed as it has to be, this is the only way you are likely to get understanding.
Otherwise, it's you missing the understanding, whilst "low brows" like Trump, seem to be getting it.
Are you going to let him beat you, in understanding the truth about why only solar energy use is technically creation, which is reductiion of temperature by Landauer's principle, a lab proven, fundamental law of nature?