I am not aware of making any claim. The claim being made is the interpretation of the data to incorrectly draw an illogical conclusion from it, and it's not me making that claim.
Can you identify which part of the information in that link implies or shows reduction of frequency of hurricanes or storms?
Now check also the frequency of tornados occurring in that one single storm that just hammered the US. Nobody seems to be able to count the number of tornados that actually occurred during the storm but we have multiple videos showing them running three at a time, so the total number of tornados that occurred throughout the run is estimated in the hundreds.
You folk were very, very lucky, to have not lost more people than was lost.
All I am saying is, beware of any attempts to interpret more as less. The last thing I guess anyone wants to do, is keep underestimating the nature of this beast, and it is a beast, scientifically defined as an emergent property, that drives all of us, to carry on with the business of monetised destruction as usual.
Understimate where that has to go at your own peril, I'd say.
I do have some background in this, you can always check it out in my profile with latest stories.