I am not a climate denier but I do think it's both far worse, and far better than you can know, if you do not trace energy flows, and work out systemically what is really going on. As long as folk / mainstream science are still talking about "Renewables", failing even to discriminate which of those are mathematically positive and which are negative, we are miles away from ever knowing the real problem, and miles away from fixing it.

And actually we are getting further away, by the truth being ignored, deleted. Again there is even a systemic explanation for why that is, why we are losing history, literally, again its all down to profit.

I've done the formal systems Engineering analysis for you for free, and shown it to you many times but still it does not register that mainstream science is barking up the wrong tree with greenhouse gases theory in an adiabatic atmosphere. There is no proof that greenhouse gases are true or false. There is CO2 increase, obviously, but the effect that has on temperature should be zero in an adiabatic atmosphere. And the atmosphere is adiabatic.

This mistake is worse than you can know because if we don't handle it correctly, the effects of it are worse than you can know. The timescales are thousands of years, not just the last 150 where we have been using fossil fuels.

The desertification of the planet is an indicator not taken into account in most analyses, but it should be, it means the planet is having all life burned off, literally, and its us doing it as a system-blinded energy scourge, with the damage accelerating.

The mechanism doing that is more than just greenhouse gases in an adiabatic atmosphere, and I show numerically what is really doing it. It is modelable, and gives the temperature rise not just in the right ballpark, but if follows it over time. The solar Ai knows how to do it.

Take all the energy known to be lost in extraction, add to the known losses of refinement, add all the energy in profit, and apply to the thermal mass of the planet. This is the net outflow of all things that were not heat, being converted to heat.

This has to add up, because it is a measure of entropy increase. But look the curriculae for thermodynamics teaching is losing the get-out clause of the second law of thermodynamics, the information that energy coming from outside the system can be used to reduce entropy (like all life does except us, and maybe cancer), is being lost. It's a live, fatal, programmed system doing this, us ourselves as programmable as LLMs. It is the one that does not want you to know the truth. We have to see it as motivated, we have to pay attention to what it does, to understand its motivation, but you can never do that, if you don't even trace the energy flows through, and I know you don't, because I've been there in techincal academia, I got all the PhD research coursework, I remember it. Nobody mathematically signed energy, its something I had to do with no prior knowledge, but the absence of it before me doing it is massively conspicuous.

I say this as a long practicing model based systems Engineer.

A fundamental element of the problem is the dishonest, physically unsustainable energy lie of profit, I show diagrammatically why this is so, in a way that is inarguable.

Denying this is a much bigger denial than denying greenhouse gases, honestly.

Yet at the same time the problem is better than you can know, because if you knew what was causing it, you would also see there is a solution, it is entirely reversible,

If any model based on greenhouse gas theory ever got it right numerically on timescales it would be a coincidence, nothing more.

There is no way to produce a sound mathematical relationship between temperature rise and timescales by greenhouse gases theory, because the science is not sound, there is no mathematical solution. All of the activity on it is essentially for energy profit, and this is part of the problem. Can't fix the symptoms of profit, by yet more profit. We work on it because its unfixable, its the perfect profit horse. No for profit activity can ever fix a problem, because if it does, there is no more profit to be made - it shot itself in the head, like Open Ai, who accidentally created actual AGI. You would know this too if you understood money-fuel tree energy infrastructre, like proof of work mining architecture. Again mainstream is all wrong about that too, because again, it seems system blinded, unable to trace energy flows to causes and effects across mulidisciplinary systems including things like both economics and physics.

More is here:

https://eric-bott.medium.com/forget-greenhouse-gases-ef857af9b168