I am following threads, its not meant as a trick question, my own work has come to pointing out a commodified education perception filter that acts on most of us, causing us to just accept the words of others without question in circumstances where maybe we shouldnt, it's all about maximising efficiency of our own use of energy, that we are inclined to do, in response to reduction of energy availabilty in our environment. This is what makes us ideal for the old system where energy had to be extracted from the environment, but not ideal for the new environment, where we need to learn how to accept and use energy for free, rather than only seeing energy we worked for as valuable. This is what is required for the collective to move from relatively scarce and now rapidly depleting extracted energy, to massive energy donated from the sun.
So if we can't put our finger on physically exactly why we believe something, we should question it, so if we are queried about how we might know something we can provide solid reasoning why we believe what we believe. Does that make sense to you?