I am equally skeptical of the models of mainstream science, because it is all for profit, which mathematically depends on energy extracted from Earth.

I've shown this inarguably usng maths and data, it is physical reality.

Money will continue to be devalued, until it is issued to reflect the economic product created from solar.

I've shown this too, inarguably, mathematically.

I sent you the link.

You commented on it, but I guess you didn't see the full significance of what it says. Notice it is observation, not theory.

Profit ends, when we move fully to the energy of the sun, there will no longer be any need for it. Why would mainstream science want that, if they think it would be the end of their business?

I don't have a crystal ball, just 6 years spent voluntarily working on the problem using specialist systems Engineering skiils, experience, and tools.

We are not at the end of much worth saving.

That part is my opinion, to me it seems crazy to interpret everything negative as something positive.

Everything negative happens, on mathemtically negative energy. Try populating out the use cases, there are an infinity of them. All of them end badly. Profit is the thing unsustainable and actually responsible for just about everything bad we can imagine, and has now become existential.

This is destruction.

Compare this with the use cases for mathematically positive energy use, and we struggle to create a bad scenario, every one we can imagine extends ad infinitum with good outcomes, indefinately.

This is creation.

it has been a rough ride to date, everyone fighting for existence, but the crossroads is really on us now.

I would never dare try to put a date on when the catalyst happens.

All I know is we go positive, the instant money is issued reflecting solar economic product added to Earth to date, the only source of which is the sun.