I already listened to and responded to Nate's materials some time ago. I am sure he does with the best of heart. But he doesn't take into account that the energy from the sun is mathematically positive, adding to the capital of Earth, rather than subtracting from it, as energy by extraction does.
We only need to look at the god-signs all over hydrogen to know it is the systemic key. The side effects of using it include purification and distribution of drinking water. Did you notice we have a pending drinking water problem? It solves this whilst functionally replacing fossil fuels with none of the pollution, and even is the input energy to the production of food without plants (See "Solein"), so actually converting to food for humans. Did you notice we have a pending food problem?
If you are concerned with Engineering Credentials, mine, last time I looked read something like BEng MSc MIET MiNCOSE CEng.
My specialism is Systems Engineering.
My current effort on the energy problem began as PhD candidate research work in 2017. I do it all voluntarily, at my own expense, using the same expensive formal Systems engineering tools as I've used for many years designing and implementing all manner of systems for corporates. You can check out my experience on Linkedin, just like any other professional.
Ignoring the mathematical signing of energy, and always talking about nonsensical "Renewables", will just result in inflation continuing to get ever worse, because for the first time in history, nature is directly driving it, until we do what it demands. The proof is here:
