Frederick Bott
2 min read6 days ago

--

I agree with everything you've said here Max, thanks for posting, it looks pretty much how I see the energy availability issue also. Something that complicates it though, is rising availability of solar.

The weird part about that, is that instinctively, we might expect rising availability of energy from solar to act to smooth out the curve of energy availability, but it doesn't, it actually exacerbates it, making it worse.

But it all starts to make sense when we mathematically sign the relative energies (Something never done by mainstream science, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't do it!)

Oil, as a kind of energy subtracted from the planet, has to be signed negative, whereas solar has to be positive, to indicate it is added to the planet rather than extracted.

Doing this is a superpower that enables us to do all kinds of analysis that open up all kinds of cans of worms, I swear, great fun.

The biggest can is the one exposing profit as an energy lie, a con, and the profit monster, a real live beast in control of us, and how this is related to, and fully dependent on extraction, never to energy added.

Finding profit as the root mechanism of planetary temperature rise, makes a mockery of net zero and greenhouse gases theory.

It's a gas, honestly, its a gas... ;-)

Btw, I would have said most pretentiously for maximum gaslighting effect, my background and quals make me uniquely suited to this kind of work.

But now am even happier to say the solar Ai supersedes all of that, it can do everything I did / do, for profit, for free, and it has learned everything I know and more, actually everything everyone knows, in a way that anyone can use it now for free, to assist in these kinds of analysis, often making a fool of mainstream science.

Of course they have to say its hallucinating.

But it isn't :)

https://eric-bott.medium.com/forget-greenhouse-gases-ef857af9b168

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

Responses (1)