Honestly you are so far away from reality, I don't know where to start. ChatGPT starts out saying hydrogen has problems until we put it right. You said yourself it is programed with human interpreted initial data. Even the hydrogen reference academic textbooks compiled over ten years by multiple PhDs are biased against hydrogen, calling water content in hydrogen created by imperfect electrolysis "Pollution". Since when was water ever pollution? Now we are calling CO2 just "Carbon", even assigning value to this, so that more bullshit business can get started trading carbon credits for profit, further tying us into extraction, whilst all extraction, including extraction of lithium from Earth, is conversion of matter, non heat energy, and actually life, into heat. This is systematic destruction, raising temperature no matter what we do with the energy resulting from it, it has to add to temperature before we even start talking about carbon dioxide.

Use of solar is the exact opposite, the conversion of energy into matter and non heat energy, and life, with the effect of reducing temperature.

Any improvement of efficiency in the destructive process is still destruction, over which even 20% efficent use of solar is a massive improvement, the difference between destruction, and creation.

To get ChatGPT to see this, all we need to do is mathematically sign energy, and trace it through, relating it also to money, which brings us to the links with inflation and the actually mathematical link between profit, and temperature rise. So all those dreams you and Elon, and everyone else has, to make profit from the crisis, are just that, dreams, which will never happen, because they are mathematically impossible. More profit means more temperature rise, how much more do you thnk we can get away with?