Here is the thing, how can any of the writers you quote know the difference between destruction and creation, if none of them ever mathematically signed energy, as required to do the math of auditing the system, to know which use of energy creates, and which destroys?

When we use the energy of the sun direct to create hydrogen by electrolysis, every kg created contains 33KWhrs of energy removed from the potential heating effect of the sun, regardless of efficiency.

A 2.4KW electrolyser ("Enapter" for example), which could be maintained running 24hrs with a complement of maybe 14 to 18 panels, produces a Kg of hydrogen every 24hrs.

This is creation, and reduction of temperature by definition, per thermodynamics (Despite the latter often being abused by doomers to try to claim otherwise).

The same goes for if we drive computers by solar, every binary bit of information defined and stored, is reduction of temperature by 0.69 x Boltzman's constant in degrees C.

This is creation, again regardless of efficiency, when done by the energy of the sun, because again all energy dissipated by the computers can never exceed the energy put in, so the net result when all is done, is the creation of the information alone. Again a direct embodiment of thermodynamics - reduction of entropy and temperature by definition.

The same goes if we aircon a greenhouse in the desert.

All the energy dissipated by the aircon can never be more than the energy put in, and if some of the energy put in goes to maintaining a hospitiable environment for plants, those plants then will use more solar energy themselves, thus building on the creative process started by having the aircon powered by solar, and the whole thing can actually be grown to repopulate entire deserts with greenergy, thus driving back down global temperature.

Plants define binary information in their structure, just like everything that lives does. Power it by solar energy and there is no destruction, nothing to push up temperature.

See the difference?

Does any of the writers you mention talk about this, to dispute it?

No because they can't.

Nor can you dude.

The critical question, is knowing what life is really all about, its to create, not destroy. Destruction is anti life, all destruction, all heating.

Life is all about creating.

Keep destroying, by use of profit, which is directly linked and dependent on negative energy, and nature will destroy us, very soon now.

But start creating, by ditching proift, issuing solar indexed stimulus, we could go on to actually an adult species that really adds value to the planet.

Further, our kids could have a great future in the creative scenario.

Can you bear to think of them having to deal with the current scenario (Destruction), being maintained "To the death"?