Formal Notice of Intention to Ban from Own Work
Something becoming apparent now, there are maybe some irretrievable cases.
Further to the the article I wrote recently, on whether or not to ban folk, I am still vehemently opposed to banning. If laws on this were up to me, I would elevate Metcalfe’s law to statutory. Nothing should be banned or cancelled, it should be up to the greater crowd to decide what is and is not acceptable for their own eyes.
But banning someone from our own space has to be a prerogative, for our own mental safety.
Sometimes there are cases that cost us more time, and cause more anguish than we should put up with, for the sake of our own mental health. And besides, they are a distraction from much more important things we might be working on.
I have one such case right now, and have had to think (Not long!), on whether or not to just cut them out of my space.
The thing is I don’t want to do this. What was the point of doing the research I’ve done, if it was not for public benefit?
But things are getting crazier by the minute, the world of Enshittopia is escalating rapidly, the real war is between truth and lies, it really is, we even have proof of it, and you can be sure nature agrees, remember it has a lie detector, which is one of the things the subject of my ire seems to want to deny:
So I am going to have to get harsh, to protect my own work, and my sanity.
It’s science, just new science, non-profit science, but this is the future.
So for you Hưng Huỳnh, congratulations, you made it to the first of my list of folk on notice of being banned from my work.
Here is the comment from him I will quote as the basis for banning:
He draws an unfair conclusion from what I said. I have a long history of being part of science myself, and I still have many would be scientific reviewers of my work in Medium. I’ve been part of STEM forever, held several formal research positions myself, though I am very critical of it now, because of what I see is the massive conflict of interest of mainstream science, given that it is mostly for profit now, and profit itself is an unsustainable, dishonest energy lie.
So Hưng Huỳnh If you want want to be thrown out, no worries, no need to do anything, you already did enough, I will be banning you within 7 days as stands. If you come back with more unfounded arguments and accusations, I will make that immediate, on first contact from publication of this notice.
You have seven days to come and provide some criticism backed by your own research or analysis, on my work, which you call “Fake Science”. You can choose any of my 450+ stories on the subject of the global energy problem.
I will be more than happy to review researched comments, but I will not stand for any further assertions from you showing no basis for your beliefs.
Otherwise it’s goodbye to you. You had your chance to understand reality, and life, decrease of entropy, truth, creation, survival, rather than increase of entropy, lies, destruction, death, but you didn’t take it.
No, you threw it back in my face, after I did it all for you, for free.
