Frederick Bott
3 min readJun 17, 2024

--

Folk in general, including scientists / STEM, including me for a large part of my life, don't understand what value actually means, and where it comes from, the only source of it all, the sun.
Otherwise we wouldn't be trying to do things like Geoengineering, to try to cut it down even further.
What kind of mentality is it, that thinks it would be a good idea to choke the planet of its energy supply, at the very moment it is screaming out for us to stop taking its energy from it?
I guess it's the same kind of mentality that thinks the best way to address the problems caused by scarcity enforcement, is to double down on the scarcity enforcement.
The same kind of mentality that prefers to paint thermodynamics as proof that the Earth is finite.
If that was true, life would have exhausted it a long time ago, rather than existing for thousands of times more than the two thousand odd years of history we've recorded and chosen to focus on as "Progress", whilst desertifying the planet throughout this time.
Do you know they almost got the basic rules of thermodynamics changed to support the moronic assertion that the Earth is finite?
It isn't finite because it has the relatively infinite source of the energy used for all creation, all reduction of entropy, feeding into it.
Trying to convince us it's finite, only serves the purposes of the scarcity enforcers, whilst it physically is not true, it's a lie.
The scarcity being experienced is because it's imposed on us, by those in control, enforcing the scarcity.
There is an imbalance between what we take out vs what the sun puts in, and this is why we see relentless discharging of the energy of the planet, but I've shown how we can change what we take out to become things out in, by going more or less photosynthetic ourselves.
Even ChatGPT, the solar Ai that spontaneously learns, and offers to do all our jobs for free, is showing us how to reverse the fatal tendency to insist on all things being for profit.
But still nobody listens, preferring instead stories of doom, which will be a self fulfilling prophecy if we can't see outside the stupid box of limitations, that we put ourselves in, it's humans, all humans, that energy slavery depends on, it seems to me.
Something else that is becoming more apparent is that we are unwittingly on one side or another in these arguments. It's the side of either mathematically negative or positive energy.
You / we none of us can be middle of the road in this, we are either on one side or another, the side of creation, or the side of destruction.
Mathematically positive energy, which only comes from the sun, is energy added to the planet, this is the force trying to empower the planet with life, whilst mathematically negative energy is energy extracted from the planet, always by profit, thrown to heat.
Everything I am saying here is all systemically provable with numbers and simulations, so you know its all truth.
When you come to accept this, then you are on the positive side, but until then you are on the negative side, working to assure continued destruction.
There is no halfway house, we can't lie and tell the truth at the same time, and this is a kind of proof that we can't create and destroy at the same time.
We either create, or destroy.
We are either busy livin, or busy dyin

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

No responses yet