Fantastic that you claim to wish to redirect military budget towards addressing the environmental threat.
But investing in nuclear would be no such redirection.
The problem of extracting capital energy from Earth, driven by money as debt, whilst generating pollution continues as long as we are not connected to the only actual source of energy, the sun.
That is a very simple physical fact which has been consistently ignored by the articles of the anonymous B, and now also by you.
B has succeeded in propagandising you, it seems to me.
Do you think your enemies should have nuclear power?
Why not?
Why should we think nuclear is ok for us but not for our enemies?
Because it is a weapon of mass destruction first and foremost, thats why.
Its use for utility power generation is a secondary function, designed to legitimise it.
Sorry but this article of yours and all of Bs look like the worst kind of insidious propaganda to me.