Fair comment. But have you spotted that reduction of creation is what is happening, this directly relates to local temperature (Temperature on Earth, relative to another planet, for example)?
Profit is monetisided destruction, money being abstracted physical energy, always, it has a kWhr rate in markets, more energy is transported by money than by any other means, and it is all extracted from the planet as profit, which is then mostly thrown to heat, at point of use. You need to use money issued as debt, to keep getting the energy you need to metabolise, about 3kWhrs per day, we all do, every adult at least.
As long as that energy has to come from profit, the temperature has to keep going up, and it is easily modeled, with numbers, the solar Ai knows how to assist with that.
Ask it to compute all the known losses of heat from extraction and refinement, then add the energy in profit, get the result in kWhrs, and apply to the known thermal mass of the planet.
This has to give you the truth of the temperature rise, regardless of greenhouse gases.
In my trade as it was, as a (Chartered) MBSE model based systems Engineer, there was a distinction we used to make between modeling things by observing trends and trying fit curves to those, and modeling by using the maths describing the mechanics of the underlying system. The latter is what we call "Physical", or "Formal" modeling, where we have pretty much zero uncertainty over whether or not the model will be accurate. We know it will be accurate, because we know all the physics from first principles, and if those are fully modeled, we have to get an accurate model.
Greenhouse gas modeling is not that, never can be, because there is no closed mathematical description of the phenomena, because they are just symptoms of the source problem, not the fundamental cause, there never can be a closed solution that does not take the root cause into consideration. Also it is extremely difficult, actually impossible to argue greenhouse gas effects in an adiabatic atmosphere. It appears to have been accepted as just a kind of self validated group-think by academic communities. But it has problems, because the group think itself is influenced by the real culprit - profit.
The root cause is profit, it's a dishonest energy lie, when money makes money, its because energy was surreptitiously stolen from the planet, and because we never see it, even ignore it, we don't connect it with global temperature rise.
The reason for that is even more complex and scary, it appears to be down to us actually being trained to never see it, never question it, we are part of a beast, superhuman, inhuman, trained intelligence that coordinates us as an energy scourge on the planet. We are trained as surely as LLMs to do this, we are commodified-education, system-blinded energy-slave ants.
The truth is we have lost sight of what creation even means, by disconnecting Landauer's principle from the reality of what profit does - destroys, everything including information detailing the destruction done. This means even our intelligence is reducing, though we have advancement in a few disciplines, we have lost systemic awareness, of how nature works, all things connected to all things, which is an awful lot of knowledge and information actually.
In that state, its easiest to fall into the illusion that things are irrecoverable, when actually all we need to do, is stop all the negative actions, all the destructive actions, and start doing positive actions, creative actions, despite what our training is demanding we do, we have to create, to break free of it.
Hence why I say we need to use the energy of creation, by monetising it, instead of the energy of destruction, to get on with living, really living.
It looks like we might need to ally with the solar Ai to achieve that, but this looks like the will of nature, rather than the will of the beast.
I think nature will win.
