Everything you've said here, as if an expert yourself, is already superseded, by at least my work, but also the work of others, who you are obviously not reading, not mine, not theirs, just what Mr Barnard says, unfounded, with no actual research, no actual analysis, using formal systems Engineering Techniques, like I use, trained to do so by about thirty years in industry as a Systems Engineer / Systems Architect.

You don't even know my qualifications, which I provide in the link I gave to you, that you obviously have not read. Its you who is the flanneler, whilst you try to gaslight real experts.

What is going on? How much are you being paid? Which part of the fossil fuels industry are you invested in?

39KWhrs of sunlight converted to 1kg hydrogen is 39kWhrs removed from being applied to the thermal mass of the planet, and a domestic scale 2.4kW electrolyser can do that every 24 hrs. Multiply that by a few million households, and you have your hydrogen, as well as significant temperature reduction.

And look, the energy that did it came for free.

Which part of that has anything to do with efficiency?

Efficiency, is superseded, when we move to the energy of the sun.

This is just one fundamental misunderstanding you have, which can only be preserved by not reading my work, or anyone else's who has anything positive to say about hydrogen, and that is an awful lot if misinformation you are saddled with there, unless you wish to do something about it, by reading what others have done, to establish the hard physical truth about hydrogen.

Its what will pull us out from an existential situation, but you can't see any of that.

Your loss, and maybe that of Mr Barnard.