Ever wondered how much energy is spent developing, and talking about what is still an unproven theory?
I see it becoming a little like flat Earth - no matter how much evidence is found to the contrary, there will still be some folk developing on their belief the Earth is flat.
Banging on about the big bang, when it is patently obvious to most people that talking still, in terms of the big bang, is just banging on about nothing.
As to how it practically affects anything; big bang practitioners have to argue that Earth was formed from dust by accretion, at the same time as the sun and all the planets around it.
Earth and it's solar system all sit in a disk, with all the planets rotating in the disk around the sun, all planets rotating in the same direction around their own axes, more or less perpendicular to the disk, with every planet in a perfect equilibrium orbit, around the sun.
If we touched a single planet with any force, towards or away from the sun, we would knock it out of orbit, either inwards towards the sun, or outwards away from the sun. equilibrium would be broken, the planet touched would be on a new trajectory, either towards, or away from the sun.
If sun and Earth were formed by accretion, this would not be the case, there would be a natural tendency for all things to fall naturally into orbit, not out of orbit.
See the problem?
Such perfect equilibrium as lasts for billions of years we've found impossible to replicate in satellites. In all cases, all satellites require on board energy to be dissipitated, under human made control, to maintain the orbits of all satellites.
Still no big deal, no real harm done, yet. But now we started GeoEngineering.
What does this do? Well if we manage to refect enough of the rays of the sun to change the amount the Earth absorbs, in an effort to cut down the heating of the planet, we will also have increased the solar pressure on Earth.
Solar pressure has to be part of the secret sauce of a perfect orbit, it is an integral component of the equilibrium, combined with centrifugal force, and gravity. Solar pressure has to act in the same direction as centrifugal force, directly away from the sun.
So if we increase it, without changing anything else, the Earth has to start moving away from the sun. Ever so slightly at first, but before long, exponentially, as gravity is progressively overcome by centrifugal force and solar pressure combined.
By the time we could measure the resulting change in trajectory, it would be too late to correct, there is no energy source on Earth, and certainly no propulsion system we could use to possibly try to seek out the magic path that we should have taken, to get back into equilibrium, after we detected a problem.
This is what many investors want to do with their money, and are actually doing, though they don't realise it yet. Investing in Geoengineering, which they say, based on entirely unfounded and systemically flawed beliefs, will fix rising the rising temperature issue.
They couldn't be more wrong, and they / we really will wish we didn't have to find out the hard way, it's an experiment that should never be allowed.
This is another reason why it's so important to move completely to energy independence by universal solar energy as soon as possible, before we do something stupid with undiluted capital, which is actually stored energy, that blows up in our face.
The big bang theory actually can be quite harmful.