Enrique you don't mention the part played by domestic and community based solar, because there are no figures documenting this, we have to deduce from demographics data compared with known historical energy requirements of population, which don't change much, subtracting utilities energy supply figures from this to get estimates of what is supplied by domestic and community based solar. I've shown how to do here:
Its important to do this from the point of view of economy, so as to ensure money is issued to cover the economic product created by domestic and community solar, which could be producing hydrogen for aerospace, keeping the latter airborne, in addition to also creating food for the local community from hydrogen, and using also for their own backup, reducing battery reaquirements, all whilst cleaning and circulating both air and water, best of all whilst reducing temperature, since what we create from solar is reduction of the heat impulse, no matter what we do with it, other than not use it at all.
Futher, it would be most naturally done under the control of the solar powered Ai, since it is already demonstrating the required distributed money fuel-tree architecture that would be best used by all communities, removing most of the need for grids.
Here is an issue for you which we are faced with, as long as there is such a thing as utilities energy business for profit, the net energy movement is not from supplier to consumer, but the other way round. Convert all monies paid for bills to KWhrs at market rates, and it has to come to more KWhrs than were supplied as electricity or fuel. So it is actually the consumer supplying energy to the supplier, not the other way round - utillities energy supply at profit is a con, an energy con, which actually locks us into energy extraction from the planet, which in turn is directly linked to rising temperature.
So we will never fix the rising temperature problem as long as there is utilities energy supply for profit.
What do you say to that?
