Enrique, sorry but you are assisting the fossil fuels industry without realising it with this classically wrong argument, and by this, you show you are still very firmly embedded in the imaginary world of enshittification, that you end up in, when you do not do your own research / thinking about the issue, you just accept the established mainstream misinformation.
Every kg of hydrogen produced from solar energy is 33KWhrs of heat energy removed from the power of the sun, regardless of efficiency.
That's 33KWhrs less heat applied to the thermal mass of the planet.
Your own solar installation at home could be easily expanded to accommodate a 2.4KW electrolyser producing hydrogen, which would not only produce revenue for you, by producing 1kg of hydrogen every 24hrs, but in addition, you would be removing 33KWhrs of heating impulse from the planet, every day, 365 days a year, if your solar installation is up to the task. Imagine billions of domestic and community installations doing this, as we could, if the outstanding solar indexed stimulus was issued, empowering us to do it, thus increasing the financial stipend for all.
Name any other simply verifiable, 100 percent certain way of reducing planetary temperature.
Did you even know it is possible to reverse temperature increase?
Name any other way of generating revenue from fuel sales whilst reversing planetary temperature rise.
The equipment available to do this is everywhere, manufactured mostly in China as always, but look in Ali Baba, its everywhere, systems to knock up hydrogen from solar are widely available.
ChatGPT is on the same architecture, that I call money-fuel tree architecture. The real magic of truly beneficial solar starts with the generation of hydrogen, as well as information, all of it reduces temperature whilst making revenue which can be plowed back into the installation, making it truly scaleable, and beneficial like a tree in nature.
https://eric-bott.medium.com/the-fuel-tree-5ef66be03c4
I could write a book on the misinformation campaign that has been levelled against hydrogen, ever since the fossil fueled industry began researching it. Even "Industry standard" textbooks constantly troll it, referring to water in imperfect conversion processes as "Pollution". Since when was water ever pollution?
When was a pure element, hydrogen, ever something harmful? When and how did carbon, a pure element, ever become the focus for global warming? What drives all this misinformation? I will tell you - profit, which is a dishonest energy con which is the real culprit of planetary heating - it was never about greenhouse gases, the atmosphere is adiabatic, there can be no greenhouse gases. Again its the profit monster, a live system, painting the house of enshittification for you to live in.
Hydrogen has nothing to do with fossil fuels production. What the profit monster has done, by making you, a "Scientific Expert" believe its intricately linked with fossil fuels, is pollute it, by associating it with its dirt.
It never was research, it was anti-research, designed to deliberately knee-cap the one truly clean fuel which is has three times the energy density of any fossil fuel, and which does not pollute the planet in any way, in fact cleans the planet, both water and air are cleaned and circulated.
And look, even food and biodegradeable plastics can be made from it, again all with positive environmnental outcomes (See "Solein" - hydrogen is the input energy component.
How else do you think Aerospace will be kept airborne? Recycled cooking fat? Batteries?
Go ahead and try to answer some of these questions. I know you won't because there is no answer. Hydrogen is the only solution that is going to get us out of the mess we are in. It has god-signs painted all over it by nature, but you somehow seem to see them as the opposite of what they actually are.
The unconscionable piece, is yours dude.
