Enrique I am surprised you write a story one day about how you enjoyed a free ride in your EV, having charged it from your solar panels, then a few days later write a story about a currency which literally, mechanically monetises the same free energy as charged your car, and still you don't mention the connection, between Bitcoin, which is obviously very valuable, and free energy.
Both Bitcoin, and your free EV trip, demonstrated the value of free energy, by being valuable solar product, which has to be monetised.
In the case of Bitcoin it was monetised, but in the case of your free trip, it was not.
Imagine everyone working on free energy like you did, but also generating hydrogen with their excess, for sale as fuel to others who might need it for their energy requirements, as well as maybe creating food, Solein, for example.
That would still be a bustling of economic activity, probably even more so than we see now, with everything obviously going into seemingly unstoppable recession and depression.
But where would the money needed to enumerate that economy come from, if money was still only issued as debt, and no-one needed to run up any debt to survive, living for free from sunlight?
Logically, Bitcoin would be the goto in that scenario, but only if banks did not issue funds to compete with it.
Funds for free, issued at some rate of solar Joules per token, would be the only way to compete with POW crypto of any description.
Personally I am quite excited to see which bank cracks first, though I know it will be painful, it can't come soon enough.
The sooner it happens, the less pain there will be.