Depends on what we call scientific evidence.

Science is not that clever, since we know they didn't even think to put the mathematical sign needed on energy, despite all the trouble and confusion, even existential confusion, that the missing sign of energy is now causing.

Until they fix that, they are not addressing a major credibility issue, which can only get worse.

There appears plenty of circumstantial evidence indicating the existence of Nibiru.

Scientists working on human genome have often made the comment in research papers that the human genome shows evidence of domestication.

Science itself, since the "Enlightenment", when it diverged from religion, and became profit driven, has incentive to not follow this track of inquiry, using instruments like Occam's razor to cull "Useless research" because the whole idea of intellectual property is thrown into question if it turns out much of the technology we claim as "Ours", by our own "Discoveries", actually never was ours to claim.

Knowing this, we start to question an awful lot abouit science, it seems to me.

Here is a Systems Engineering analysis of Nibiru;

"Geo-Engineering", is something currently "under research" by profit driven science, the same science as ignores the mathematical sign of energy.

So they want to put a shield up, against the only source of positively signed energy, to solve the problem of depleting energy on Earth, and they are gathering VC investment to do that.

Foliage, is the natural interface on Earth, between all of life on Earth including us, and the only source of positive energy.

The foliage at any point on Earth is physically attracted to the source of positive energy, actually turning towards it when it rises in the mornings, following it throughout the day, tracking it, so as to maximise the energy absorbed by their leaves.

In the mornings the foliage has to be "Hungrier" for energy than in the evenings, so in theory, there is a higher proportion of photons absorbed by the side of rotating Earth approaching the sun, than the side of Earth receding from the sun, which means there is a differential in solar pressure on Earth, from one side to the other, forming a motor effect on Earth, which serves to assist the direction of spin, on Earth.

Reducing the foliage then, would result in a reduction of the motor effect, and we might notice a reduction of the speed of rotation on Earth, and we do, when we look at nuclear clocks, and note that we really do have to insert leap seconds to maintain syncronicity of those, with the rotation of Earth, so the rotation of Earth really is slowing down.

This has been known by science since leap seconds began to be inserted in the 70s, but has always been dismissed as due to a natural cause, a supposed friction between Earth and moon, manifesting as energy lost in the rising/falling tides on Earth. But if this was true, we would be seeing the change in relative rotations between Earth and moon, which we don't, the actual change observed is in the rotation of Earth relative to sun. So the change we are seeing has to be due to the change of motor effect on Earth.

Now it turns out that solar power infrastructure has in theory a similar positive motor effect as that of foliage, by having the same characteristic of being "Hungrier" for energy in the mornings than in the evenings, charging up storage devices in the mornings, fully charged in the evenings, this artifical foliage is likely to have even greater motor effect, because it absorbs a higher proportion of photons than foliage, so less of it is needed to provide the same motor effect as a given coverage of foliage.

This is proof of the force of solar pressure on Earth.

The effect of Geo-Engineering, would be to increase the net solar pressure on Earth, by reducing the amount of photons being received and put to use on Earth.

The orbital trajectory of Earth around the sun, results from perfect equilibrium between the three forces of solar pressure, sun-centric centrifugal force, and sun's gravity.

A change in any one of these forces will destroy the equilibrium.

Increasing solar pressure, with no change in any of the other forces, will result in Earth losing orbital equilibrium, with the effect that Earth is thrown outwards, from the sun, into space.

This is what will result from Geo-Engineering.

After that, if fusion power has not already been achieved, this would be the only way of providing positive energy like the sun, which would be needed to maintain any life on Earth whatsoever.

There, we would have converted Earth to a wandering dark planet, a smaller version of maybe Nibiru, maybe explaining what Nibiru was all along, just a planet broken free of its sun, by the greed of its "Intelligent" population.

Assuming we would achieve fusion, it would become the thing taken control of by the most vicious of our own inhabitants, ruling the rest of us by being able to supply power only to those supporting them, maintaining their power hierarchy.

Further, that fusion would be developed to form propulsion forces, capable of propelling the planet towards other planets, which of course would be seen as valuable targets, potentially capable of adding to a "Fleet" of dark planets.

Now maybe all religion, technologies, aliens, histories, universes start to add up, there we maybe see a purpose, and a kind of war going on, between the forces that want Earth to be solar powered, and forces that don't, and this might be connected with our genes, and the reason some of us are more allergic to the positive energy of our sun than others.

We might be genetically programmed for a particular purpose, but that program is obviously hackable, otherwise I would not be writing this.

If we go solar powered, as seems to be happening now, grid energy companies are being overcome by domestic and community solar, economy has to change to Kardashev Money to stop inflation, we all of us become "Idle rich", basking in solar energy, no more crime, no more poverty, no more inhumanity, working on non-profit things like immortality, and of course space craft to go to other planets, just for curiosity. We become "Goodies".

On the other hand, we go Nibiru, Earth itself becomes the spaceship, humans become inhuman, and we join the "Baddies"

So aliens arriving on spacecraft are probably not hostile, whereas aliens arriving on a planet, well that would be very bad news.

This looks like a completed jigsaw to me, all the pieces fit, and all the maths adds up.

What do you think?