"Deflecting the topic" - I am referring to my own work on the subject as a long experienced Engineer, a veteran of thirty years Engineering with also historical energy patents, as detailed in the book referenced in my profile.

So I say it is you who is the flanneler, the one showing no actual substantiation, and the one reluctant to try to comment on any of the stories I've directed you to.

Where are your own aricles on this subject you seem so intent on impressing folk with as a seeming expert?

All of this like I said elsewhere is like a five year old trying to get involved in an adult conversation, making all the noises you hear adults making, but not understanding the actual concepts at all, yet trying to sound authoritative, like you know better.

I wouldn't mind but it does waste a lot of time trying to deal with... it's a distraction I could do without.

Btw you are right, it isn't science I do, it is Engineering, which is applied science. Scientists don't necessarily agree that Systems Engineering evidence is evidence, but it is the kind of evidence used to build actual airborne systems, and all manner of actual systems we use every day.