Cool article, thanks for pointing me to it. I can see a few technical details needing adjustment, I pointed those out by PMs on the parts I noticed, but if you are not previously a power Engineer, still a great effort, no show stoppers it seems to me (I am a Systems Engineer). I too write incessantly on this subject, but I avoid talking about wind, though I don't see any harm in it, it adds no beneficial work, unlike solar but it might serve a purpose as something we can use to cut the size of solar farms, until sufficient building integrated solar infrastructure can be implemented.

We can't generate money from wind, as the Joules captured are already part of Earth capital, which is already included in the economy.

In contrast, the Joules we receive by solar are from a source not already on Earth, therefore those Joules that we put to use from the sun, are constantly added to Earth. But they are not yet included in our economy. The only way we can fairly reflect that, is to issue free money on those, since they were donated to us for free (after installation costs).

Do that, as we must, everything changes, solar suddenly becomes a much more powerful force.

The Money-fuel tree story explains how it can be done by cryptocurrency, but in theory banks could issue it. However as they originally defunded Nikola Tesla (Who you mentioned, yay!), 120 years ago, because he was onto this, they knew free money would devalue all capital, which would remove their ability to control everything by controlling capital, of course he was defunded. And here we are with heat-domes causing spontaneous fires in Sibera and other former permafrost areas, plastics in our food chain and even in the air, and a third world war brewing over energy, we are in a pickle, which can only be sorted out by accepting the energy of the sun, the same way as nature does, it seems to me.

Here is my similar effort aimed at the UK: https://eric-bott.medium.com/nuclear-power-in-uk-is-not-only-not-viable-but-no-longer-even-possible-c81a3eb3cce7