https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8196y545no

Chris Hoy Cycling Star Terminal Cancer

How to write about this tactfully? I probably can’t. All the more reason to write about it, maybe.

Frederick Bott
7 min readNov 3, 2024

--

Firstly, to Chris; if you read this Chris, my heart is with you. I can’t imagine how bad it must feel to be in your position. I wouldn’t wish it on anyone.

I don’t mean this piece to belittle your predicament in any way. Rather, I wish to use your predicament to help enlighten us, all of us, to some brutal reality, which is entirely preventable.

I’ve been an avid cycling fan all my life. It’s probably the only sport I ever actually supported. There are so many things about cycling that teach us about life in general. Cycling is life, human life.

Chris has done so much for cycling, and so much for life.

Also Chris is a Scotsman. We are countrymen. Kindred souls from that point of view too.

Cancer is probably the biggest preventable disease we are afflicted with, in modern life.

I lost a younger sister to cancer early in life. She was seven, I was ten. We were a family of only three at that time, my sister, my mother and I, so my sister was a big loss. My mother died of it too, a few years ago.

I always thought we’d find a proper cure for cancer, within maybe a few years.

God knows, we’ve spent enough researching it. There is actually no technical reason no cure exists for it, at least not in the Western world.

The Beast is what prevents the cure.

My own studies have revealed to me there never will be a cure, as long as we live for profit.

Cancer is actually a requirement for profit, as are pretty much all modern diseases including covid.

It’s a kind of built-in obsolescence, as sure as the obsolescence we know is built into apple devices, for example.

But the system causing it, the system of energy slavery we live by, using profit, has itself reached the end of it’s serviceable period.

Now we all stand to die by it, every human, and probably all of life, if we allow it to continue to completion.

It’s ultimate conclusion, after thousands of years, is the cessation of all life on Earth, and we are now accelerating towards that end, unless, and until we make the necessary change, which I write about, in my stories documenting the research I’ve done, over the past seven years.

This was my immediate thought, when Chris made his announcement; I thought actually, we are none of us much better off than Chris, all of humanity, we are all on a similar death sentence, with probably similar timescales.

Just most of us don’t realise it yet. But we will, the sooner the better, because it is preventable.

This is the brutal truth of where we are at, if we are honest, we none of us have much better prospects than Chris, we are all on a death sentence as stands.

I have every confidence we can and will change this.

But right now we are on a death sentence, with the fundamental element of profit still being what we each of us have to depend on, to get at least the minimum energy we need to metabolise, about 3kWhrs per day, every day.

If you doubt this, just look at the latest changes made by the UK government in taxes, they are hitting farmers, a vital food / human energy source we need to live on. I don’t think they could have known about this when they drew up their plans, because they don’t employ folk like me, systems Engineers, who could have predicted this is what their plan would have ended up with, mass starvation. They can’t afford to employ us any longer. So now we work for free on state benefits, as long as that will last. But obviously they don’t value the work we do, because it’s for free.

The problem is, when we do the systems Engineering on the system of humanity and nature, we find it is physically unsustainable, and nobody wants to hear that.

Profitability itself, specifically the energy in it, is what is physically coming to an end.

This is nature at work. We have no power over it. There is no way even with the greatest will in the world, the will of all people put together, we cannot change the physical fact that all possibilities of profit are disappearing, and profit is actually a dishonest energy crime against the planet, which even basic law and order is based on, so as profitability becomes more and more difficult, so it all has to slide into crime.

In the end, we are living as energy slaves, with no choice but to ultimately rip-off the energy we each need to live on, from one another, and ultimately this has to knock on to the planet.

This is what the system of scarcity enforcement has to deteriorate to, in it’s final essence, it is just about each of us robbing what we can from those less able than ourselves to rob, we steal the energy we need to live on, from other humans, and ultimately the planet.

This is the physical reality, disguised by the imaginary world of Enshittopia we’ve created, that we live in, to blind ourselves from the reality.

This is the real matrix, that we all work for, without realising it, as agents of it. Every assasination ever done, was done by agents working for this beast, even the assasination of Christ, this is what it was all about.

Since we each depend on profit, specifically energy profit (Money is just abstracted energy), for the energy we need to live, then we have to die too, if we remain dependent on it.

The Genocides underway, the Planetery disasters underway, they all have to just get worse now, exponentially worse, to claim all human life, as long as we stay in this mode that can only be described as energy slavery, hooked on the energy of destruction.

Today BBC news had in the ticker-tape below the main screen, that the UN reports 50 kids were killed in 48 hrs in one small area of Gaza.

This is whilst the main program was Kemi Badenoch, the new conservative leader, discussing with the news presenter Laura Kuenssberg, how things might be better or worse, under the conservatives, under Kemi at some point in the future.

Did they mention the genocide going on in Gaza?

No, because they are living in Enshittopia, most firmly embedded in it, in Enshittopia.

No matter how rich or poor, this is the death sentence we all are facing, like Chris, just most of us still live in Enshittopia, living in it, doing the unwitting work of the beast that controls and coordinates it all.

It too is doomed, it has to die. But not before us, as stands.

We need to put it before us, we need to put it to death, before us, if we want survival.

I’ve said enough here, this is the end of this story.

Here is the other story, the solution:

===============================================================

Footnote / Update (Added 08/11/2024):

Chris is doing some great work to promote greater awareness of Prostate Cancer, resulting already in an NHS review of recommended age for screening.

Also I notice some relevant articles which are further related to prostate cancer and actually to the global energy problem (What is there, that isn’t related to energy? Nothing).

We probably wouldn’t need, or be using so many harmful chemicals in agriculture, if there was not permanent pressure of profit in the system.

Further, we should deduce logically that everything done by solar energy including the generation of hydrogen and related food and plastics products (See “Solein” for example), it follows that the plastics and chemical products that should result from a new positively powered system of chemistry (Rapidly, by read-across from fossil fueled system), will also be fully biodegradeable and compatible with life, rather than inducing illnesses, the new hydrogen based system of chemistry should be fully compatible with life by default, rather than being actually just slightly more useful forms of pollution.

This would fit with the energy polarity multiplier framework.

The illnesses resulting from negative energy use, including the spectrum of harmful products such as all the chemicals identified as causing cancer, yet being necessary to sustain agriculture etc, are a multiplier of the negative system, so this is a negative multiplier.

Conversely we should expect a corresponding positive multiplier, a new system of “Positive chemistry” when we change the polarity of energy use, from negative to positive.

It seems reasonable to expect for every chemical with harmful effects that we know from fossil fuels, there should be corresponding positive equivalents, which have truly all the benefits of those seen in the negative powered system, but with none of the negative outcomes.

Again the exhaust products of humanity consuming hydrogen instead of fossil fuels, should be expected to be fully compatible with nature. We should expect this just because we moved up a notch in the energy consumption chain, from consuming the energy of Earth, to consuming the energy of the sun directly, like plants do.

This should be something recognised and acknowledged, the benefits of becoming photosynthetic as a species, or even as a new superorganism, as seems to be “On the cards”.

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

Responses (2)