Because CO2 is a symptom, not the cause of anything it's a mathematical multiplier of the root problem.
Look for proof C02 is the problem, there is none, and no mathematical law which says its the problem, we can't even measure the energy locked into any atmospheric C02 envelope, it's all based on a theory which has never been confirmed one way or another but it makes a lot of money working on it as you can see, all money which reflects only extracted energy, because money is energy, the money spent on bullshit business like C02 management, including all the stories written to try to sell it, are a measure of yet more temperature rise.
Which part of this do you think is wrong? How much more do you need to see to know we are not doing the right thing?
I show all the mathematical Laws, not theory, dictating how temperature has to rise as a direct result of the destruction being done.
The two things are the same, temperature rise and destruction.
So you can jump and scream indignance I didn't read the story, I did you a favor not reading it, I saved the planet some precious extracted energy, a little less destruction was done, because I didn't waste the energy to read it.
Got it?