"Appealing to ancient aliens" Those are your words, not mine. I am saying we need to use logic, to follow it through. We should do this, knowing the likeliehood of evidence being obliterated. Didn't you see the statues marking history being torn down, done with the best of intention maybe, but very flawed, illogical, emotional intention. That is just one example. Modification of language is another. We have prohibited even talking about some things, it is illegal. The intention behind that has to have the opposite effect from what was intended. A little more of it and we'll be able to say racism and slavery doesn't exist, never did, no scientific proof, its just a vicious rumour, a figment of some demented person's imagination.
How is it that when we do the system analysis necessary to establish the full nature of the energy problem, we come across so many things that sound religious, and yet they align perfectly with what we conclude from the analysis, that stealing (Energy from the planet), murder & artificial birth control (Removing potential future sources of creation / use of positive energy), greed (The tendency to prefer keeping all energy to oneself), worshiping false gods from below (The energy beneath our feet), anointing ourselves as false gods (human leaders trying to lead humans like superhumans), all of that, and much more in alignment is defined as "Evil", at least in the main traditional religions of white folk, and sure enough by the systems Engineering we can identify them all as multipliers of the effects of using mathematically negative energy. Beyond a certain amount of systemic coincidence, in most practical situations, we would say this is evidence, but because it would be bad news for things like Intellectual Property, and the careers and reputations of many mainstream scientists, it is ridiculed as fantasy, and yet look at the implications of what is being ignored, if it happens to be the truth - if it does happen to be the truth, then ignoring it is literally existential. In practical engineering, before it often gets overridden by profit, there is an old saying "If the worst case consequences are unacceptable, don't take the risk, however small the risk". Are we really happy to take the risk with the immediate future of all of life, for the sake of profit, as always?
